Can Windows Mobile pull up its socks?
December 17, 2008 in Editorial, News by dave

Not long ago, AT&T executive Roger Smith was hinting that his company would prefer to support one type of mobile software which was widely interpreted to mean that AT&T might eventually set their sights solely on Symbian, which came out comfortably over Windows Mobile this year, according to research firm Canalys. Since then, a bit of gloom has just kept spreading through the Windows Mobile news world.
BusinessWeek have an article up that outlines things they feel that Microsoft needs to fix in order to stay in the fast-paced mobile game. They break it into three main necessities: touch displays, mobile cloud computing, and its own app store. Windows Mobile is seen, by some research firm execs, as “chasing the market” but many, like me, worry they aren’t chasing fast enough.
While most of us would instantly argue that Windows Mobile has a touch interface, BusinessWeek (among others) consider most Windows Mobile devices to have ’stylus’ interfaces.
[ad]
As far as mobile cloud computing is concerned, BusinessWeek had this to say:
Microsoft also should also follow Google’s and Apple’s lead in the area of wireless cloud-computing services. The move would shift energy-sapping computing power away from users’ cell phones and onto the powerful servers maintained by Microsoft. Rivals are already offering such services. When you purchase an iPhone application from the Apple App Store, the payment is processed on Apple’s servers rather than on an individual device. When you ask your G1 to find the nearest sushi joint, it’s Google’s servers and not your phone that churn out the map. In both cases, your phone doesn’t do much legwork. Most of the processing is done on remote servers “in a cloud.” So processing typically happens faster and it requires your handheld device to be less sophisticated—and less costly. As cloud computing spreads onto rival software-based devices, Microsoft could lose $850 million in revenue in 2012 alone, according to Bernstein Research—unless it ramps up its own efforts.
As far as a Microsoft branded app store goes, I agree that one can’t come soon enough. Plenty of sources have been saying for months now that Microsoft is already working on something called Skymarket, which will offer applications and cloud services. Let’s just keep our fingers crossed on that one.
All in all, I will say that – though harsh – BusinessWeek is right on the money with a lot of these ideas.
Microsoft, are you listening?
[via]
[ad#amazon-slideshowco-1]



Market Share Report Shows Windows Mobile, iPhone Slide Further
Bing for WinMo Updated to 5.1, Includes Real Navigation
Two New Themes for Spb Mobile Shell: GTX Sense and Sketch
Teens Still Text Messaging Machines
Shell Switcher Available For Windows Mobile Devices
Kin One and Two Get Terrible Reviews Across the Board
Cell Usage Stats Show Apple, HTC, Android Don’t Make Top 5
Teens Review Kin One and Kin Two
Play PlayStation Games on Windows Mobile Devices
While I agree that WinMo has been dragging its feet, it has been due to the fact that an outside influence needed to catalyze the marketplace into recognizing many of these unfulfilled needs. However, this catalyst emerged over a year and a half ago in the form of the iPhone announcement. MS is not driving the technology forward, quite the reverse, consumer demand is trickling up to manufacturers who in turn request updates. MS has been a great dampener to progress. However, because the other options have been so much worse, it has been able to stay ahead, until now. With Android in the market place, open-source hounds can be appeased at the same time as technology sophomores are given easy access to a soon-to-be sleek app store. The technology inept can certainly go the Apple route, where all the choices are made for the consumer already.
The app store: I don’t really favor it for myself, but I am heartily in support of what it represents. It means easier access to apps for novice users. That means better apps available for everyone.
Cloud-computing: That’s why I use SkyFire. Other apps SHOULD be doing this, but few are. The OS could be too. Mostly this is not happening because MS hasn’t encouraged it.
The touchscreen: I have an extreme loathing of everything Apple. However, the iPhone has a couple of key characteristics that I hope to see in the marketplace as a whole. Touch is good, multi touch is better; the gestures like pinch and spread make sense intuitively. As a result, the browser and photo viewer have a tremendous advantage when compared to these functions on other devices. MS doesn’t really have any functions that are designed for finger access. Everything is designed around the stylus, though a fingernail will do most of the time.
The bottom line is that I have no love lost for MS, and would jump ship to a better option in a heartbeat. Right now there isn’t one, but soon? Perhaps.